In the process of these reforms, many grew wealthy and later required a special class of warriors to protect their wealth-much like that of the medieval lords of Europe. , wherein it included land redistribution and heavy new taxes meant to support the elaborate Chinese-style Empire (Szczepanski, About.Ĭom). These warriors belonged to the Samurai class, which was the highly revered warrior class in Japan-much like the Knight class in Europe.The rise of the Japanese samurai was said to have occurred after the Taika reforms of 646 A. The Japanese Samurai Japan had their own share of formidable warriors which are quite similar to the European Knights. Whichever the case, the Knight has been a major force during the middle ages, especially during the battles. It can be compared to a Ronin Samurai, a case wherein the samurai has no master (Roninreunited. It was not really much the evil dark Knight that people heard from legends.Rather Black Knights were simply those who did not wish to serve under any lords or lieges, and did whatever he wanted to. One historical knight during the middle ages was the Black Knight. They seemed to inflict fear into the hearts of the enemy, unless they would be able to counter the charging knights. The enemy soldiers would tremble at the sight of them. They have been branded as highly-skilled warriors, making them a very important asset on the battlefield, running down enemy positions and chasing stragglers-the role of the cavalry class for years to follow. It has been mentioned that they may have originated from the cavalry forces and officers of the Ancient world (knight-medieval. With this being said, the Knight class was highly regarded within the European Kingdoms, as well as on the battlefield. Knighthood has been deemed to be the pinnacle of a man’s life during the Middle Ages (Kalif Publishing, knight-medieval. So, it could be concluded that knights were part of the cavalry division within medieval armies probably the highest warrior class in battle. Knights would vary from foot soldiers to horsemen, although it has been deemed that knights were more of the latter since they practice the code of chivalry (which will be discussed later on) which was derived from the French’s Chevalerie which meant “skill to handle a horse” (KnightsAndArmor. They served their respective lords (lieges in their case) accordingly, as they have sworn loyalty and protection for these noblemen. The Medieval Knights of Europe Medieval Knights were a major force in European kingdoms during the middle ages. They would be compared in a way, as if they were in battle against each other.So, let the battle between the two classes begin. They will be compared and contrasted in terms of the following categories: Their history, weapons and armors, and code of ethics (Chivalry and Bushido) that they practiced. In order to achieve such a result, it would be best to look into the lives of these two warriors during the Feudal ages, during which they proliferated and received utmost respect. However, only one should stand out as the most formidable warrior during their time period. Such an encounter was deemed inevitable.Both were considered as formidable warriors in the past. These two warriors are the Medieval Knights of Europe and The Japanese Samurai. These two figures also achieved fame in the contemporary period, as many adopted these two warriors into the current pop culture-animation, literature, photography, movies, and the like. Both would fight for honor, for the protection of their respective lords, and for their kingdom. the Japanese Samurai Two historical figures during the Feudal Ages arose, as their respective side’s best warriors. However, one could only prevail over this fantasy-filled battle between the European Medieval knight and the Japanese SamuraiChivalry and Bushido: The Medieval Knight vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |